Can a SDIRA Avoid the PFIC?

A self-directed IRA or (“SDIRA”) has the ability to invest in private equity and startup-style investments. A SDIRA can also invest in offshore and foreign entities. These types of offshore and foreign investments often trigger the so-called Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) tax regime. However, done properly, a SDIRA can likely invest in offshore and foreign investments without triggering PFIC tax consequences. This article will discuss how a SDIRA is taxed and how a SDIRA can avoid PFIC tax consequences if it holds passive foreign investments normally subject to PFIC.

How a SDIRA is Taxed

An IRA is considered a tax-exempt entity, meaning that it generally does not pay taxes on interest, dividends, or capital gains within the account. As a tax-exempt organization, an IRA is subject to the tax-exempt rules stated in the Internal Revenue Code. Since 1950, exempt organizations have been taxed on unrelated business taxable income, which is defined as gross income (less directly connected expenses) derived from an unrelated trade or business. IRC 514. If the property producing such income is acquired with borrowed funds, however, the debt-financed property rules of Internal Revenue Code Section 514 treat all or part of the income as unrelated business taxable income with the result that it is subject to tax.

An exempt organization is taxed on unrelated business taxable income which is defined as gross income (less directly connected expenses) derived from an unrelated trade or business. An unrelated trade or business is defined as: (a) any trade or business; (b) that is regularly carried on; and (c) is not substantially related, aside from the need of the organization for funds, to the organization’s exempt purpose. In most instances, investment activities of exempt organizations would be regularly carried on and not substantially related to the organization’s exempt purpose, thus meeting the second and third prongs of the definition of an unrelated trade or business. It is less clear whether the conduct of investment activities constitutes a trade or business. The regulations of the Internal Revenue Code provide that, in general, the term “trade or business” has the same meaning it has in Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code and generally includes any activity carried on for the production of income from the sale of goods or the performance of services. The Supreme Court held in Higgins v. Commissioner, 312, 217 (1941) that an individual’s management of his own investments was not a trade or business even though the individual’s activities were extensive enough to require an office and a staff. Congress ultimately overruled Higgins and enacted Section 212 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 212 of the Internal Revenue Code allows individuals to deduct “ordinary and necessary” expenses for producing income, managing income-producing property, or handling tax-related matters.

Certain types of income, commonly referred to as “passive income,” are excluded from UBTI. IRC Section 512(b). These include dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans, amounts received or accrued as consideration for entering into agreements to make loans, annuities, royalties, rents from real property and personal property leased with the real property if the rent attributable to the personal property is 50 percent or less of the total and the rent does not depend on income or profits derived from the leased property, and capital gains and losses. IRC Section 512(b)(5). In addition to passive income, royalties are excluded in computing the unrelated business taxable of a tax-exempt entity. A “royalty” has been defined as any payment received in consideration for the use of a valuable intangible property right, whether or not payment is based on the use made of the intangible property. However, payments for services provided in connection with the granting of these types of rights are not royalties and are generally taxable as unrelated business income.

The UBTI for SDIRAs are taxed at progressive trust tax rates, which can reach up to 37% for income over $16,000 (as of 2026). If an IRA generates over $1,000 in annual gross income from unrelated business income, it can be subject to UTBI tax at a rate of 37%. As discussed above, deductions are permitted for expenses that are “directly connected” with the carrying on of the unrelated trade or business, and net operating losses are allowed to be carried forward and backward (with certain limitations). Losses from one unrelated business activity are not able to offset gains in another; profit and losses are determined per activity.

Below, please see Illustration 1 which provides an example as to how UBTI can be assessed against a self-directed IRA holder.

Illustration 1.

Jill invested $500,000 from her IRA into an LLC custom jewelry company. The investment gave Jill a 25 percent interest in an LLC. The LLC had three other owners, not related to Jill, and none of the other investors were co-owners with her in any other business entities. Jill was not involved in the LLC’s day-to-day operations and did not otherwise personally benefit from the investment.  The LLC recorded a significant profit on its annual Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Income Tax Return. In turn, each investor, including Jill’s self-directed IRA was issued yearly Schedules K-1, Partner’s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc., which showed ordinary income. The Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on income earned by a tax-exempt organization in a trade or business that is unrelated to the organization’s exempt purpose. This type of tax liability is known as UBTI and it became a large tax liability for Jill.

In this case, since the LLC Jill invested into conducted a regularly conducted business, the self-directed IRA had a tax consequence. To make matters worse, in Jill’s case, the self-directed IRA was taxed at trust rates. This resulted in Jill’s self-directed IRA realizing a far greater tax liability compared to an individual who is taxed at ordinary marginal tax rates. Jill may be shocked to discover that her self-directed IRA is subject to taxes on the LLC’s yearly profits, but also that the tax rate on income over $16,000 is a whopping 37 percent. In addition, there was an additional net investment income tax of 3.8 percent assessed on the trust income over $16,000.

The Taxation of UDFI

The exclusion for passive income is not available for income derived from debt-financed property. Section 514(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code requires an exempt organization to include UBFI a percentage of income derived from “debt-financed property” equal to the “average acquisition indebtedness” for the taxable year over the average amount of the adjusted basis for the taxable year. A like percentage of deduction is allowed in computing UBFI. IRC Section 514(a)(2). The straight-line method of depreciation must be used. IRC Section 514(c)(3). Debt-financed property is defined in Section 514(b)(1) as any property held to produce income with respect to which there is an acquisition indebtedness at any time during the taxable year or, if the property is disposed of during the taxable year, at any time during the 12-month period ending on the disposition. The statute contains several exceptions to the definition of debt-financed property, which have the collective effect of limiting its application to investment income. Specifically, the following are excepted from the definition of debt-financed property: (a) any property substantially all of the use of which is substantially related to the organization’s exempt purpose; (b) any property the income from which is included in UBFI without regard to the debt-financed property rules, except that gain from the sale or disposition of such property is not excluded under Section 512(b)(5); (c) any property to the extent income is excluded under Section 512(b)(7) relating to government research, Section 512(h)(9) relating to college, university, and hospital research, and Section 512(b)(9) relating to fundamental research the results of which are made freely available to the public; (d) any property used in any trade or business described in Section 513(a)(1) relating to work performed by volunteers, Section 513(a)(2) relating to convenience of members, etc., and Section 513(a)(3) relating to selling of merchandise received as gifts; and (e) neighborhood land acquired with the intent of using it for exempt purposes within 10 years.

Acquisition indebtedness is defined as the unpaid amount of (a) indebtedness incurred by the organization in acquiring or improving debt-financed property; (b) indebtedness incurred before the acquisition or improvement of the debt-financed property if such indebtedness would not have been incurred but for such acquisition or improvement; and (c) indebtedness incurred after the acquisition or improvement of the debt-financed property if such indebtedness incurred after the acquisition or improvement of the debt-financed property if such indebtedness would not have been incurred but for such acquisition or improvement and, the incurrence of such indebtedness was reasonably foreseeable at the time of such acquisition or improvement. See IRC Section 514(c).

The statute excludes from the definition of acquisition indebtedness a number of transactions that relate to non-investment transactions common to exempt organizations. These include: (a) a 10-year exception if mortgaged property is acquired by bequest or devise and certain conditions are met; (b) liens for taxes and assessments that attach before the payment date; (c) extension, renewal, or refinancing of an obligation evidencing a pre-existing indebtedness; (d) indebtedness inherent in performing an organization’s exempt purpose such as indebtedness incurred by a credit union accepting deposits from its members; (e) charitable gift annuities; and (f) certain federal financing for low-and-moderate-income persons. The statute also excludes from the definition of acquisition indebtedness securities loans and real property acquired by pensions trusts and schools, colleges, and universities.

If none of the statutory exceptions is applicable, then, to determine whether there is acquisition indebtedness, one must first determine whether there is indebtedness and then determine the indebtedness is traceable to the acquisition or improvement of income-producing property.

Below, please see Illustration 2 which provides an example as to how UDFI can be assessed against a self-directed IRA plan holder.

Illustration 2.

Mark had $1.5 million in his 401(k). Mark decided to invest the $1.5 million in a SDIRA. Mark’s goal for his SDIRA was to invest in residential real estate through an LLC. Mark found a real estate investment group that frequently organized partnerships and promised “passive” investment (no direct involvement by Mark). The real estate partnership collected capital contributions from 20 investors and used the cash plus debt to purchase an apartment building. The apartment building was held as a rental property, with net income distributed to the investors, including Mark’s SDIRA.

How U.S. Investors are Taxed on Foreign Investments Classified as PFICs

Now since we discussed how a SDIRA is taxed, the next subsection of this article discusses how PFICs are taxed. The objective of the PFIC provisions of the Internal Revenue Code is to deprive a U.S. taxpayer of the economic benefit of deferral of U.S. tax on a taxpayer’s share of the undistributed income of a foreign investment company that has predominantly passive income. Although the PFIC provisions were aimed at U.S. persons holding stock in foreign investment funds, the PFIC provisions have a much broader impact. The PFIC provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may apply to any U.S. person holding stock in any foreign corporation, even one engaged in an active foreign business such as manufacturing, for any tax year in which the corporation derives enough passive income or owns enough passive assets to meet the definition of a PFIC.

A foreign corporation is a PFIC if it satisfies either an income or asset test. Under the income test, a foreign corporation is a PFIC if 75% or more of the corporation’s gross income for the taxable year is defined as “foreign personal holding company” for purposes of Subpart F provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, with certain adjustments. Internal Revenue Code Section 954(c) defines “foreign personal holding company income” to include most types of passive income, such as interest, dividends, rents, annuities, royalties and gains from the sale of stock, securities or other property that produces interest, dividends, rents, annuities or royalties. See IRC Section 954(c)(1)(A) and (c)(1)(B)(i). The adjustments include exclusions for income derived from the active conduct of a banking, insurance, or securities business, as well as any interest, dividends, rents, and royalties received from a related person to the extent such income is properly allocable to nonpassive income of the related person. A “related person” is defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 954(d)(3). An individual, corporation, partnership, trust or estate that controls or is controlled by a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) is a “related person.” Control means, in the case of a corporation, direct or indirect ownership of more than 50 percent of the total voting power or value of the stock of the corporation.

For purposes of the income test, passive income is subject to four exceptions. The first two exceptions relate to income from the active conduct of a banking or insurance business. See IRC Section 1297(b)(2)(A) and (B). The third covers interest, dividend, rent or royalty income received from a related person to the extent that such income is properly allocated to income of such related person that is not passive income. See IRC Section 1297(b)(2)(C). The fourth covers certain foreign trade income subject to special treatment under two preferential tax regimes for export sales.

Under the asset test, a foreign corporation is a PFIC if the average market value of the corporation’s passive assets during the taxable year is 50% or more of the corporation’s total assets. An asset is characterized as passive if it has generated (or is reasonably expected to generate) passive income in the hands of the foreign corporation. See IRC Section 1297. Assets that generate both passive and nonpassive income in a tax year are treated as partly passive and partly nonpassive to the proportion to the relative amounts of the two types of income generated by those assets in that year. See IRC Notice 88-22.

Taxation of PFICS

A shareholder of a PFIC is subject to the Section 1291 excess distribution rules in which shareholders must allocate excess distributions and gains realized upon the sale of their PFIC shares pro rata to their holding period. See IRC Section 1291(a)(1)(A).

An excess distribution includes the following:

1) A gain realized on the sale of PFIC stock, and

2) Any actual distribution made by the PFIC, but only to the extent the total actual distribution received by the taxpayer for the year exceeds 125 percent of the average actual distribution received by the taxpayer in the preceding three taxable years. The amount of an excess distribution is treated as if it had been realized pro rata over the holding period of the foreign share and, therefore, the tax due on an excess distribution is the sum of the deferred yearly tax amounts. This is computed by using the highest tax rate in effect in the years the income was accumulated, plus interest. Any actual distributions that fall below the 125 percent threshold are treated as dividends. This assumes they represent a distribution of earnings and profits, which are taxable in the year of receipt and are not subject to the special interest charge.

Interest charges are assessed on taxes deemed owed on excess distributions allocated to tax years prior to the tax year in which the excess distribution was received. All capital gains from the sale of PFIC shares are treated as ordinary income for federal tax purposes and thus are not taxed at favorable long-term capital gains rates. See IRC Section 1291(a)(1)(B). In addition, the Proposed Regulations state that shareholders cannot claim capital losses upon the disposition of PFIC shares. See Prop. Regs. Section 1.1291-6(b)(3).

Below, please see Illustration 3. and Illustration 4. which demonstrates a typical sale of PFIC stock.

Illustration 3

Jim is an engineer and a citizen of Germany. Jim moved to California and became a U.S. green card holder. Jim likes to invest in foreign mutual funds. On the advice of his German broker, on January 1, 2016, Jim buys 1 percent of FORmut, a mutual fund incorporated in a foreign country for $1. FORmut is a PFIC. During the 2016, 2017, and 2018 calendar years, FORmut accumulated earnings and profits. On December 31, 2018, Jim sold his interest in FORmut for $300,001. To determine the PFIC excess distribution, Jim must throw the entire $300,000 gain received over the entire period that he owned the FORmut shares – $100,000 to 2016, $100,000 to 2017, and $100,000 to 2018. For each of those years, Jim will pay tax on the throw-back gain at the highest rate in effect that year with interest.

It is easy to envision significantly more complex scenarios. Such a scenario is described in Illustration 4 which is based on an example in Staff of Joint Comm. On Tax’n, 100 Cong., 1st Sess., General Explanation of Tax Reform of 1986, at 1027-28(1987).

Illustration 4.

On January 1 of year 1, Samatha, a U.S citizen, acquired 1,000 shares in FC, a foreign corporation that is a PFIC. She acquired another 1,000 shares of FC stock on January 1 of year 2. During years 1 through 5, Samatha receives the following dividend distribution from FC:

Under Internal Revenue Code Section 1291, none of the distributions received before year 5, are excess distributions since the amount of each distribution with respect to a share is 50 cents. However, with respect to distributions during year 5, the total distribution to each share is 37.5 cents ($1 minus 62.5 cents (1.25 times 50 cents)).

Accordingly, the total excess distribution for FC’s tax year ending December 31 of year 5 is $750 (37.5 per share times 2,000 shares). This excess distribution must be allocated ratably between the two distributions during year 5. Thus, $562.50 (75 percent of the excess distribution, i.e., $750 times $1,500/$2,000) is allocated to the April 1 distribution and $187.50 (the remaining 25 percent of the excess distribution, i.e. $750 $500/$2,000) is allocated to the October 1 distribution. These amounts are then ratably allocated to each block of stock outstanding on the relevant distribution date. For the distribution on April 1 of year 5, $281.25 of the excess distribution is allocated to the block of stock acquired on January 1 of year 1 and $281.25 is allocated to the block of stock acquired on January 1 of year 2 and $281.25 is allocated to the block of stock acquired on January 1 of year 3. The $187.50 excess distribution on October 1 of year 5 is also allocated evenly between the two blocks of stock outstanding on the date of the distribution. Finally, the excess distribution for each block of stock is in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 1291(a)(1).

The federal tax due in the year of disposition (or year of receipt of an excess distribution) is the sum of 1) U.S. tax computed using the highest rate of U.S. tax for the shareholder (without regard to other income or expenses the shareholder may have) on income attributed to prior years (called “the aggregate increase in taxes” in Section 1291(c)(1)), plus 2) U.S. tax on the gain attributed to the year of disposition (or year of receipt of the distribution) and to years in which the foreign corporation was not a PFIC (for which no interest is due). Items (1) and (2) together are called the “deferred tax amount” in Section 1291. Item (2), the interest charge on the deferred tax, is computed for the period starting on the due date for the prior year to which the gain on distribution or disposition is attributed and ending on the due date for the current year in which the distribution or disposition occurs.

As indicated above, not only are the PFIC taxing rules complex, these rules can generate significant tax liabilities which, in certain cases, exceed the value of the foreign stock.

How are Foreign or Offshore Assets Held in SDIRAs taxed for Purposes of the PFIC Tax REgime

As discussed above, a self-directed IRA is only taxed under the UBTI and UBFI rules. Under the UBTI rules, passive investment income such as dividends, capital gains, and standard distributions generated inside an IRA is explicitly exempt from the UBTI rules. It is also not subject to the UBFI rules. Because an IRA is a tax-exempt entity under Section 501(a), it is not subject to the above discussed complicated PFIC “excess distribution” tax, ordinary income reclassification, and compounding interest charges at the time distribution occurs. Thus, in cases where PFIC are properly held SDIRA, earnings will grow inside the IRA until distributed. Thus, SDIRAs that hold offshore or foreign assets taxed under the PFIC regime are not subject to the PFIC tax. Rather, once a SDIRA makes a distribution, the distribution will be taxed at ordinary rates to the SDIRA account holder. However, in certain cases, a SDIRA can be converted to a Roth IRA which can result in a significant reduction in the tax consequences of the offshore investment to the SDIRA owner.

It should be noted though, if the owner of the SDIRA continues to hold the PFIC investment after being distributed from the SDIRA, it will be taxed under the PFIC regime. Finally, PFICs are typically reported on Form 8621 to the IRS. A SDIRA account holder does not need to report PFIC on a Form 8621 during the time his or her SDIRA holds the offshore or foreign investment. This is confirmed in Treasury Regulation Section 1.1298-1.

Conclusion

The foregoing discussion is intended to provide a basic understanding of the basic understanding regarding the taxation of SDIRAs and PFICs. This is an extremely complicated area of tax law. If you are considering utilizing a SDIRA to invest in offshore or foreign investments, you should consult with a qualified international attorney. The tax attorneys at Diosdi & Liu LLP have significant experience advising clients that established SDIRAs to hold foreign and offshore investments.

Anthony Diosdi is an international tax attorney at Diosdi & Liu, LLP. Anthony has advised various Fortune 500 companies and large privately held businesses in their cross-border tax planning. Anthony is a frequent author and speaker on international tax topics.

Anthony is a member of the California and Florida bars. He can be reached at 415-318-3990 or adiosdi@sftaxcounsel.com.

This article is not legal or tax advice. If you are in need of legal or tax advice, you should immediately consult a licensed attorney.