{"id":4455,"date":"2022-02-08T15:43:06","date_gmt":"2022-02-08T15:43:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/?p=4455"},"modified":"2022-02-08T15:43:06","modified_gmt":"2022-02-08T15:43:06","slug":"how-an-ic-disc-can-be-used-to-defer-tax-on-commissions-related-to-10-million-of-export-sales-per-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/how-an-ic-disc-can-be-used-to-defer-tax-on-commissions-related-to-10-million-of-export-sales-per-year\/","title":{"rendered":"How An IC-DISC Can be Used to Defer Tax On Commissions Related to $10 Million of Export Sales Per Year"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Anthony Diosdi<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n


In 1971, Congress enacted the domestic international sales corporation (\u201cDISC\u201d) in an attempt to stimulate U.S. exports. A DISC allowed a U.S. exporter to avoid U.S. tax on a portion of its export profits by allocating those profits to a special type of domestic subsidiary known as a DISC. In 1984, Congress enacted the foreign sales corporation (\u201cFSC\u201d) provisions as a replacement for the DISC regime. A domestic corporation that established a FSC allocated a portion of its qualified export profits to the FSC and a pre-specified portion of the FSC\u2019s profits were exempt from U.S. tax. The net effect of this arrangement was that a portion of a domestic corporation\u2019s export profits was permanently excluded from U.S. tax at both the FSC and U.S. shareholder levels.

In 1998, the European Union filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization (\u201cWTO\u201d) claiming that the FSC and DISC regimes were violations of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (\u201cGATT\u201d). WTO ruled that the FSC regime was an illegal export subsidiary and called for its elimination. In response to the WTO\u2019s ruling, the United States enacted the Interest Charge-Domestic International Sales Corporation (\u201cIC-DISC\u201d) export tax incentive rules. An IC-DISC creates the opportunity to tax a portion of export related profits at lower tax rates, and to potentially export related income to future years.

Introduction to the IC-DISC<\/strong>

The IC-DISC was designed as a means by which a U.S. exporter could borrow funds from the U.S. treasury. An IC-DISC must be a domestic corporation with a single class of stock that has a minimum par value of $2,500. The IC-DISC can be a sister entity of the manufacturing corporation as well as a subsidiary of the manufacturing corporation. Although the IC-DISC itself is not a taxable entity, the IC-DISC\u2019s U.S. shareholders are subject to tax on deemed dividend distributions from the IC-DISC which are treated as qualified dividends. Qualified dividends are generally taxed at 20 percent. In certain cases, the use of an IC-DISC can result in significant tax savings to its shareholders. These deemed distributions do not include income derived from the first $10 million of the IC-DISC\u2019s qualified export receipts each year. Therefore, an IC-DISC allows a U.S. shareholder to defer paying U.S. tax on the income derived from up to $10 million of qualified export receipts each year. The IC-DISC generally may include in the $10 million its most profitable export sales.

The U.S. shareholder must pay an interest charge on its IC-DISC-related deferred tax liability, which equals the difference between the shareholder\u2019s tax for the taxable year computed first with, and then without, the accumulated IC-DISC income of the shareholder that has been deferred over the years. Therefore, a U.S. shareholder must continue to pay interest on deferred IC-DISC income until that income is distributed or deemed distributed by the IC-DISC. The interest rate is the current market rate for 52-week Treasury bills. That rate is adjusted annually and applies for the fiscal year ending September 30th. IC-DISC shareholders compute the interest charge on Form 8404, Computation of Interest Charge on DISC-Related Deferred Tax Liability<\/em>, and the interest is due on the same date as the shareholder\u2019s regular tax return, without extensions. No estimated tax payments are required with respect to the interest charge. See Practical Guide to U.S. International Transactions, <\/em>CCH (2007), Robert J. Misery and Michael S. Schadewald.

<\/strong>To qualify as an IC-DISC, the domestic corporation must pass both a gross receipts and export assets test.

The gross receipts test states that 95 percent of the gross receipts of the IC-DISC must constitute qualified gross receipts. Qualified gross receipts include the following:

1) Gross receipts from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of export property;

2) Gross receipts from the lease or rental of export property for use outside the United States;

3) Gross receipts for services that are related in or are subsidiary to any exchange of property;

4) Interest on any obligation that is a qualified export asset;

5) Gross receipts for engineering or architectural services for construction projects located outside the United States; and

6) Gross receipts for the managerial services for furtherance of production or other qualified export receipts.

The qualified export assets test states that 95 percent of the assets of the corporation must be qualified export assets. Qualified export assets include the following:

1) Accounts receivable;

2) Temporary investments;

3) Export property;

4) Assets used primarily in connection with the production of qualified export receipts receipts, and

5) Loans to producers.

Sales of Export Property by An IC-DISC<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>Although exports often think of newly manufactured property as export property, the property can be used equipment or even scrap. There are three requirements for an IC-DISC to receive income from a sale of export property:

1) the property must be manufactured, produced, grown or extracted in the United States by a person other than the IC-DISC;

2) The export property must be held primarily for sale, lease or rental for direct use, consumption or disposition outside the United States; and

3) The export property must have a minimum of 50 percent U.S. content.

The Manufacturing Requirement<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>The IC-DISC may not manufacture the export property. Generally, the shareholders of a U.S. manufacturing entity will form an IC-DISC to capture export sales. Although not as common, occasionally an IC-DISC will be a \u201cbuy-sell\u201d IC-DISC, whereby the IC-DISC will actually buy and take title to the export property from the U.S. manufacturing entity before the export sale occurs. Property is manufactured within the United States if either 1) 20 percent of its conversion costs are incurred in the United States; 2) there is a substantial transformation in the United States, or 3) the operations in the United States are generally considered to constitute manufacturing.

The Destination Test<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>The export property must satisfy a destination test, which means it must be held for sale, lease or rental in the ordinary course of business for direct use, disposition or consumption outside the United States.

Property satisfies the destination test if it is delivered to a freight forwarder for ultimate shipment abroad. Property also satisfies the destination test if it is sold to a purchaser in the United States, provided the property does not undergo further manufacturing by the purchaser prior to export and the property is shipped to a foreign destination within one year. Under this destination test, what may seemingly be domestic sales could qualify as export sales. The purchasers of an exporter\u2019s product will have to provide the exporter with information showing that the product was exported and, if the domestic purchaser cooperates, the IC-DISC can benefit from these sales.

The law is somewhat vague regarding what constitutes further manufacturing in the United States. In General Electric Co<\/em>., TC Memo. 1995-306, the Tax Court denied an export benefit, finding that the jet engines General Electric manufactured were subject to further manufacturing when they were assembled into Boeing\u2019s jet planes to be delivered overseas. However, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, finding that: 1) the airplane industry recognizes aircraft and engines as legally distinct and separate; and 2) affixing a completed product to another does not constitute manufacturing. Below, please see Illustration 1. which demonstrates the destination test.

Illustration 1.<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>TireCo, a U.S. corporation, manufactures automobile tires in the United States with U.S. materials. TireCo, through its IC-DISC, sells its tires to General Mistake, a U.S. auto manufacturer, which affixes the tires to its new automobiles that are exported to Germany. The IC-DISC can benefit from the sale of its tires to General Mistake because the final destination of the automobiles is outside the United States. By affixing the tires to vehicles is not the furthering of manufacturing.

An exporter can receive an IC-DISC benefit on sales to a foreign subsidiary. However, only the amount earned by the IC-DISC (and not its foreign subsidiary) qualifies. Five types of property are ineligible to be qualified export property. Ineligible property includes: 1) property rented for use by a related party; 2) intellectual property other than films, tapes, records, or computer software; 3) unprocessed software timber; 4) products, such as oil or coal, for which a depletion deduction is allowable; and 4) property the President designates as being in short supply.

The Minimum of 50 Percent U.S. Content Requirement<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>All export properties may have no more than 50 percent of the value of the final costs attributable to foreign components. The fair market value of the foreign content is determined based on the dutiable value of any foreign components, regardless of any costume’s benefits that would result in a lower dutiable value. Below, please see Illustration 2. Which discusses the 50 percent U.S. contest test.

Illustration 2.<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>Billy Bob, is a U.S. citizen who wholly owns a manufacturer of stuffed alligators. Due to burgeoning export sales, Billy Bob forms an IC-DISC $9 million of qualified receipts. The materials compromising the stuffed alligators are alligators from the Florida everglades and chemical to preserve the alligator, which is purchased from a factory in China. Of the approximately 50 percent of the material costs, 30 percent constitutes alligators and 20 percent chemicals. Because the majority of the content constitutes materials purchased in the United States, the stuffed alligators satisfy the U.S. content requirement. However, should the cost of the chemicals used to preserve the alligators ever rise to the extent it exceeds 50 percent of the material cost of the stuffed alligators, the stuffed alligators would not qualify as qualified property.

Maximizing the IC-DISC Income<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>The IC-DISC rules permit the use of different methods to different sales based on product lines, recognized industry or trade usage, and even by transaction. The first way to maximize IC-DISC income is through grouping. Grouping refers to the exporter maximizing the IC-DISC\u2019s commission by separating high-margin sales from low-margin sales. Exporters have considerable flexibility in grouping. An exporter\u2019s product or product line grouping will be accepted if the groupings conform to recognized trade or industry usage or the two-digit major groups (or inferior classifications) of Standard Industrial Classification codes. In addition, within the same taxable year, an exporter can use another product line.

A second technique for increasing the IC-DISC\u2019s income is marginal costing. Under the general rule, combined taxable income equals the excess of the qualified export receipts over the total direct and indirect costs related to exports. If the exporter elects marginal costing, however, only marginal costs are taken into account in computing combined taxable income. Therefore, marginal costing allows a taxpayer to increase combined taxable income by the amount of the fixed costs related to export sales. Marginal costs include only the direct materials and direct labor costs. All other costs, such as selling, general, and administrative expenses, and interest expenses, are ignored for purposes of computing combined taxable income.

An overall profit limitation restricts the combined taxable income of an exporter to an amount equal to full costing combined taxable income from all sales (domestic and foreign) multiplied by the ratio of qualified export receipts to total receipts (domestic and foreign). Because of this limitation, marginal costing is advantageous only when export sales are less profitable than domestic sales.
<\/strong>
<\/strong>A third technique for increasing the IC-DISC\u2019s income is expense allocations. Combined income equals the excess of qualified export receipts over the total costs of the exporter, which includes deductions that are related to export sales (e.g., cost of goods sold) and a ratable portion of any deductions that are not related to any specific class of gross income (e.g., interest expense and selling, general and administrative expenses). Therefore, individuals can increase combined taxable income and, in turn, the amount of its IC-DISC\u2019s income, by developing defensible apportionment bases that allocate fewer deductions against qualified export receipts.

Producer\u2019s Loans<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>One of the major innovations of the DISC system of tax deferral lay in the ability of the DISC to make its undistributed export profits available to its U.S. parent manufacturing company (or any other U.S. manufacturer of the export property) through \u201cproducer\u2019s loans\u201d without losing the benefit of the tax deferral. Because a producer\u2019s loan is not taxed as a dividend, it affords a U.S. parent company a means of withdrawing the tax-deferred export profit of the IC-DISC at no tax cost, except the interest on the shareholder\u2019s deferred tax.

A \u201cproducer\u2019s loan\u201d must meet certain requirements. The loan must be designated a \u201cproducer\u2019s loan;\u201d it must be evidenced by a note with a term of not more than five years; it can be made only to a person engaged in the United States in the production of export property; and, when added to the unpaid balances of other producer\u2019s loans, it must not exceed the accumulated IC-DISC income. To insure that outstanding loans to a particular borrower will qualify as producer\u2019s loans only to the extent of that borrower\u2019s export-related assets, the cumulative amount of loans to a given borrower is limited to an amount determined by multiplying the sum of:

1) The amount of the borrower\u2019s adjusted basis in plant, machinery, equipment, and supporting production facilities in the United States;

2) The amount of the borrower\u2019s property held for sale, lease, or rental to customers in the ordinary course of business; and

3) The aggregate amount of the borrower\u2019s research and experimental expenditures in the United States during all prior years by the percentage ratio of (a) borrower\u2019s receipt for the three years preceding the current tax year from sales or leases outside the United States of property that would be export property if held by a DISC to (b) the borrower\u2019s gross receipts over the same period from the sale or lease of inventory property generally. 

Termination of DISC Status<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>Upon termination of the DISC election or disqualification of the DISC, the earnings and profits of the DISC on which U.S. taxes have been deferred during the years in which the corporation qualified as a DISC are deemed distributed to the shareholders.

Conclusion<\/strong>
<\/strong>
<\/strong>The IC-DISC offers exporters a significant tax savings opportunity. The Foreign Derived Income (\u201cFDII\u201d) is another export incentive available to businesses that export goods and services. Our experienced international tax attorneys<\/em> can help you determine if an IC-DISC or FDII tax regime can be utilized to reduce your U.S. tax burden.

<\/strong>Anthony Diosdi is one of several tax attorneys and international tax attorneys at Diosdi Ching & Liu, LLP. <\/strong>Anthony focuses his practice on domestic and international tax planning for multinational companies, closely held businesses, and individuals. Anthony has written numerous articles on international tax planning and frequently provides continuing educational programs to other tax professionals.

He has assisted companies with a number of international tax issues, including Subpart F, GILTI, and FDII planning, foreign tax credit planning, and tax-efficient cash repatriation strategies. Anthony also regularly advises foreign individuals on tax efficient mechanisms for doing business in the United States, investing in U.S. real estate, and pre-immigration planning. Anthony is a member of the California and Florida bars. He can be reached at 415-318-3990 or adiosdi@sftaxcounsel.com<\/a>.

This article is not legal or tax advice. If you are in need of legal or tax advice, you should immediately consult a licensed attorney.
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Anthony Diosdi In 1971, Congress enacted the domestic international sales corporation (\u201cDISC\u201d) in an attempt to stimulate U.S. exports. A DISC allowed a U.S. exporter to avoid U.S. tax on a portion of its export profits by allocating those profits to a special type of domestic subsidiary known as a DISC. In 1984, Congress […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":4456,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[341,6],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4455"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4455"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4457,"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4455\/revisions\/4457"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4456"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sftaxcounsel.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}